Impact

May 2, 2024

An article1 by Bader et al., originally published on March 8, 2024, was finally removed from Radiology Case Reports after more than a month of discussion in newspapers, blogs, and social media, as well as my own correspondence with the journals’ editors. See the relevant page for details.

Figure 1: Timeline of discussion concerning the article by Bader et al.

April 21, 2024

In my article “The case for universal artificial intelligence declaration on the precedent of conflict of interest,” published today, I argue that journals should require authors to declare that they have or have not used generative AI for each and every submission.2 I contend that authors will be less inclined to actively deceive journals concerning their use of generative AI than some have been to passively omit any declaration.

April 3, 2024

Today, my article “Suspected undeclared use of generative artificial intelligence” was published in Intelligent Pharmacy.3 The journal previously published an article by Verma et al., in which the telltale phrase “as of my last update” appeared.4 I addressed this article as well as explaining the significance of the undeclared AI problem.

References

1Bader R, Imam A, Alnees M, et al. Successful management of an Iatrogenic portal vein and hepatic artery injury in a 4-month-old female patient: A case report and literature review. Radiology Case Reports. 2024;19(6):2106-2111. doi:10.1016/j.radcr.2024.02.037
2Glynn A. The case for universal artificial intelligence declaration on the precedent of conflict of interest. Accountability in Research. Published online 2024. doi:10.1080/08989621.2024.2345719
3Glynn A. Suspected undeclared use of generative artificial intelligence. Intelligent Pharmacy. Published online April 3, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ipha.2024.03.003
4Verma S, Tiwari RK, Singh L. Integrating technology and trust: Trailblazing role of AI in reframing pharmaceutical digital outreach. Intelligent Pharmacy. Published online January 15, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ipha.2024.01.005