This article1 was retracted due to a variety of concerns.2 Among those cited were the following:
- The phrase “regenerate response” appeared in the reference list.
- PLOS could not verify 18 of 76 references.
- The editors had “concerns about the article’s compliance with PLOS Authorship policy.”
The article was flagged by Guillaume Cabanac, Anna Abalkina, and an anonymous user (alias Nerita vitiensis).
References
1Shoukat R, Ismayil I, Huang Q, Oubibi M, Younas M, Munir R. A comparative analysis of blended learning and traditional instruction: Effects on academic motivation and learning outcomes. PLoS One. 2024;19(3):e0298220. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0298220
2The PLOS ONE Editors. Retraction: A comparative analysis of blended learning and traditional instruction: Effects on academic motivation and learning outcomes. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(4):e0302484. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0302484